Canned Answers, Falsehoods, Retarded Lumberjacks, Lisping Faggots: Another Pop-Quiz Vice Presidential Debate

Well done! The forced-choice two party only system of U.S. politics has heaped a goodly portion of canned answers and falsehoods upon us peasants during the Palin-Biden vice president debates last night.

But friends, was this affectionate get-together a debate in the greatest sense of the word? Is not a debate to have an argument with one another over an issue? Verily, I submit to you that no discussion or argument was carried on betwixt this mother of an unwholesome daughter impregnated by a retarded lumberjack and a pasty-faced career politician who delights in hearing himself bloviate.

Rather than the show put on by an intelligent debate, we peasants stared glassily at a sanitized high school pop-quiz forum moderated by 53 year old pro-Obama PBS correspondent Gwen Ifill who in the past has said, “I don’t know why I’m not married. I just know I will be, so I don’t sweat it.”

Wouldn’t it be better to get at least an unbiased and family-oriented moderator in to ask the important questions, or are single unmarried women who get shivers over Obama’s ‘magic’ the backbone of the U.S. now?

Glaringly absent from the canned answers was any mention of drastically reducing government expenditures and waste, affirming family as a man and woman respectfully together with child, eliminating benefits to homosexuals and transgenders, and deporting the 10-20 million illegal aliens swarming over the U.S.

Neither was there any mention of the necessary disgracing and banishing from U.S. territories the lisping filthy pervert Barney Frank who is also the current Chair of the House Financial Services Committee.

In the final analysis, no one can argue that Sarah Palin does not look handsome. Her comeliness will serve her well in the political arena, as it has done for countless politicians before her.

Let us now explore the falsehoods that the fair and tireless researchers at factcheck.org have revealed for the public good:

  • Palin mistakenly claimed that troop levels in Iraq had returned to “pre-surge” levels. Levels are gradually coming down but current plans would have levels higher than pre-surge numbers through early next year, at least.
  • Biden incorrectly said “John McCain voted the exact same way” as Obama on a controversial troop funding bill. The two were actually on opposite sides.
  • Palin repeated a false claim that Obama once voted in favor of higher taxes on “families” making as little as $42,000 a year. He did not. The budget bill in question called for an increase only on singles making that amount, but a family of four would not have been affected unless they made at least $90,000 a year.
  • Biden wrongly claimed that McCain “voted the exact same way” as Obama on the budget bill that contained an increase on singles making as little as $42,000 a year. McCain voted against it. Biden was referring to an amendment that didn’t address taxes at that income level.
  • Palin claimed McCain’s health care plan would be “budget neutral,” costing the government nothing. Independent budget experts estimate McCain’s plan would cost tens of billions each year, though details are too fuzzy to allow for exact estimates.
  • Biden wrongly claimed that McCain had said “he wouldn’t even sit down” with the government of Spain. Actually, McCain didn’t reject a meeting, but simply refused to commit himself one way or the other during an interview.
  • Palin wrongly claimed that “millions of small businesses” would see tax increases under Obama’s tax proposals. At most, several hundred thousand business owners would see increases.
  • For full details on these misstatements, and on additional factual disputes and dubious claims, please read on to the Analysis section.

* Note: The term “faggot” as appears in our post title applies aptly to the wrong and disgraceful lifestyle of homosexuals and more so to those who have no shame in standing by the tenets of sexual perversity. The time is now to shame those who are wantonly destroying the moral basis of family order. We mean no disrespect. Indeed, we mean only to regain respect.