“Without reasonableness and morality, no nation can endure.”

With this comment The Outraged One sums up the plight of the U.S. and the upcoming U.S. presidential elections.

Yes, The Outraged One is again running for the office of President of the United States. Yes, he is generally sane, even though he sometimes speaks in the third person. The Outraged One’s platform and principles can be found permanently and conveniently in the upper right corner through the link “Our Demands“. But what of the other candidates and their standbys?

John McCain. Now here’s a guy who partnered up with that red-faced womanizing slob of a drunkard Ted Kennedy to grant amnesty to the 10, 30, 60 million, or however many illegal aliens that are swarming over the U.S. And here’s a guy who approved a $700 billion non-specific taxpayer bailout to unregulated and fraudulent banking and mortgage industries. That’s unreasonable and criminal.

Barack Hussein Obama. Now here’s a guy who held company with hate filled ’spiritual advisor’ Jeremiah Wright for twenty years and with unrepentant terrorist bomber William Ayers, and who toasts to Palestinian terrorist spokesperson Rashid Khalidi. B.O.’s experience to be President of the United States? Giving handouts to black people (while ignoring Asians who fare so poorly after coming to the U.S.) and organizing voter drives to elect politicians who will continue the handouts. That’s insanity, expecting a better result but never getting it.

Sarah Palin. Now here’s a folksy gal who brings some good old fashioned bible-thumping to the political mix. She also brings along a daughter of impropriety who spread her legs for a retarded lumberjack and, surprise - surprise, was impregnated without the benefit of marriage. That’s immoral.

To her credit, Sarah Palin is the only one among the well publicized candidates who brings some personal moral commitments to the forced two party presidential elections, which McAmnesty shamefully has not brought to their campaign’s foreground. With opposition to abortion, illegal aliens, and recklessly spending bloated government high up in the top ten concerns of McCain-Palin’s conservative base, their near complete silence on these matters is incredulous.

Joe Biden. Now here’s a guy who claims to be a Roman Catholic but is pro-abortion. How does that work? Who is giving this guy communion? Worse, most Catholics would not understand the contradiction there. When a man is a hypocrite concerning one of the most fundamental cornerstones of civilization, human life, no more need be said of him.

Ralph Nader. Now here’s a guy who is great on consumer rights and the environment but a complete whack job on everything else.

Finally, Chuck Baldwin—the only sane and moral candidate among the offensive lot except Outraged Richard. Find out more about the only worthwhile registered candidate running in this farce of an election: Baldwin08.com, if you care to. Is voting for principles a throwaway vote? No, it never is. Of course, unregistered candidate Outraged Richard would like to have your vote tallied (or rather, trash-canned) in his favor, but Chuck Baldwin is the second best consideration in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Elections.

There may be other candidates but the list grows tiresome.

So there we have it on the political level nationally: reason and morality dragged down by both the educated liberal elite and the country peasants of old fundamentalist values. Thank God for Outraged Richard and Chuck Baldwin!

Don’t forget, peasants, about local level action once the fantastic hype and underwhelming expectations of the national elections fizzle out:

• You can go to a quiet reverent church.
• You can press your local police department to arrest illegal aliens.
• You can teach your daughter to say, “No, thank you!” to the neighborhood boys’ tinkle bits.
• You can rid your community of organizations that rip healthy babies from mother’s wombs.

That last part at least the Palin clan is in touch with, but the following of some good values while ignoring others is why moral conservatives are losing credibility faster than the immoral liberals who never had any.

Vote for Outraged Richard, peasants! There will be much weeping and gnashing of the teeth initially, but that will give way to modesty, cleanliness, and joyful singing echoing o’er the land. It will be like the Mormon racket, but with financial transparency, no secret handshakes, and no polygamy. We shall call ourselves… the Eloi.

Thank you, peasants, from your Dear Leader.

 

25 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds
     blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell not: for it was
     founded upon a rock.

26 And every one that heareth these sayings of mine, and doeth
     them not, shall be likened unto a foolish man, which built his
     house upon the sand:

27 And the rain descended, and the floods came, and the winds
     blew, and beat upon that house; and it fell: and great was the
     fall of it.

—Bible, King James, Matthew: Chapter 7

A comedy is playing out on the coastal seas near Somalia between armed primitives and the world’s most powerful navies.

While zipping around in amusement park sized speed boats, local natives brandish an assortment of light machine guns, rocket propelled grenades, and grappling hooks and nets which they use to board commercial ships and finagle immense cash donations from. They even have a ’spokesman’ to handle the financial exchange through ‘negotiations’, giving the whole reckless pursuit a degree of acceptability.

The latest ship to fall into the pirates’ grasp is a Ukrainian tanker containing tanks and heavy weapons, which has caused a bit of an international stir. Just as hundreds of other ships had been successfully seized and ransomed the last few years, there this war-machine carrying vessel floats awaiting the outcome of intense haggling. To make sure the exchange is fairly accomplished, an international flotilla of warships, any one of which could turn the tanker into smouldering scrap and the pirates into red spray, looks on.

To put this all in perspective, let’s look at one of the warships plying the waterways off the coast of Somalia: The U.S.S. Howard. Here we have a 509 foot long, 9,200 ton guided missile destroyer christened in 2001. She churns along at 30+ knots while carrying 320 officers plus enlisted sailors.

She is outfitted with the latest armament: 1 × 32 cell, 1 × 64 cell Mk 41 vertical launch missile systems, 96 × RIM-66 SM-2, BGM-109 Tomahawk or RUM-139 VL-Asroc missiles; 1 × 127mm, 2 × 25 mm, 4 × 12.7 mm guns; 2 × Phalanx CIWS; and 2 × Mk 46 triple torpedo tubes.

Yet she floats lazily in the sea and not a shot is heard or missile exhaust seen. How can this be? Liberalism. Feel good liberalism that is the latest rage of global politics has the honorable men and women of the U.S. Navy worried that they will hurt someone’s feelings.

The wacky logic of feel good liberalism is that somehow hostage situations are solved by showering the hostage takers with big amounts of cash-money. Incredibly, the political minds behind the cash-for-hostages response have not discerned the common connection between the hundreds of past ship hijackings and the latest hijacking—If you reward bad behavior then more bad behavior will occur.

To regain order, the international community needs only to conduct some overwhelming special operations attacks on a few hijacked ships. Or, for added emphasis in addition to retaking the ship, a complete obliteration of the towns whence the pirates came in one massive and spectacular volley. Either way, that would be the end to their high seas mischief and surely a jump in subsistence farming would be tallied at year’s end.

The cash-for-hostages plan seems non-violent and appeasing, exactly the results that feel good liberals clamor for, but it is unlikely that this newfound wealth will wind up in the collection plate at the neighborhood mosque. Rather, it is practically guaranteed that this ransom cash will be used to fund more of the typical cutthroat lifestyle: murder, rape, theft, drugs, other ship hijackings, and a general ruination of other people’s lives.

To understand what this method of rewarding bad behavior can morph into, spin your globe to the other side of the world to Columbia where half the country follows such a cutthroat lifestyle funded by the other half.

It seems like the bad guys will probably get the last laugh on this one.

*** Thank You Chauncy ($7) for your kind donation. ***

Well done! The forced-choice two party only system of U.S. politics has heaped a goodly portion of canned answers and falsehoods upon us peasants during the Palin-Biden vice president debates last night.

But friends, was this affectionate get-together a debate in the greatest sense of the word? Is not a debate to have an argument with one another over an issue? Verily, I submit to you that no discussion or argument was carried on betwixt this mother of an unwholesome daughter impregnated by a retarded lumberjack and a pasty-faced career politician who delights in hearing himself bloviate.

Rather than the show put on by an intelligent debate, we peasants stared glassily at a sanitized high school pop-quiz forum moderated by 53 year old pro-Obama PBS correspondent Gwen Ifill who in the past has said, “I don’t know why I’m not married. I just know I will be, so I don’t sweat it.”

Wouldn’t it be better to get at least an unbiased and family-oriented moderator in to ask the important questions, or are single unmarried women who get shivers over Obama’s ‘magic’ the backbone of the U.S. now?

Glaringly absent from the canned answers was any mention of drastically reducing government expenditures and waste, affirming family as a man and woman respectfully together with child, eliminating benefits to homosexuals and transgenders, and deporting the 10-20 million illegal aliens swarming over the U.S.

Neither was there any mention of the necessary disgracing and banishing from U.S. territories the lisping filthy pervert Barney Frank who is also the current Chair of the House Financial Services Committee.

In the final analysis, no one can argue that Sarah Palin does not look handsome. Her comeliness will serve her well in the political arena, as it has done for countless politicians before her.

Let us now explore the falsehoods that the fair and tireless researchers at factcheck.org have revealed for the public good:

• Palin mistakenly claimed that troop levels in Iraq had returned to “pre-surge” levels. Levels are gradually coming down but current plans would have levels higher than pre-surge numbers through early next year, at least.
• Biden incorrectly said “John McCain voted the exact same way” as Obama on a controversial troop funding bill. The two were actually on opposite sides.
• Palin repeated a false claim that Obama once voted in favor of higher taxes on “families” making as little as $42,000 a year. He did not. The budget bill in question called for an increase only on singles making that amount, but a family of four would not have been affected unless they made at least $90,000 a year.
• Biden wrongly claimed that McCain “voted the exact same way” as Obama on the budget bill that contained an increase on singles making as little as $42,000 a year. McCain voted against it. Biden was referring to an amendment that didn’t address taxes at that income level.
• Palin claimed McCain’s health care plan would be “budget neutral,” costing the government nothing. Independent budget experts estimate McCain’s plan would cost tens of billions each year, though details are too fuzzy to allow for exact estimates.
• Biden wrongly claimed that McCain had said “he wouldn’t even sit down” with the government of Spain. Actually, McCain didn’t reject a meeting, but simply refused to commit himself one way or the other during an interview.
• Palin wrongly claimed that “millions of small businesses” would see tax increases under Obama’s tax proposals. At most, several hundred thousand business owners would see increases.
• For full details on these misstatements, and on additional factual disputes and dubious claims, please read on to the Analysis section.

* Note: The term “faggot” as appears in our post title applies aptly to the wrong and disgraceful lifestyle of homosexuals and more so to those who have no shame in standing by the tenets of sexual perversity. The time is now to shame those who are wantonly destroying the moral basis of family order. We mean no disrespect. Indeed, we mean only to regain respect.