Lobster Condos Not Enough, Whole Foods Caves to Bean Eating Abortionists
Friday, June 16, 2006
Echoes of non-vegetarian grocery shopper hilarity were heard throughout big box supermarkets nationwide as Whole Foods Markets announced they will discontinue sales of live lobsters and soft crabs, saying they could not guarantee the decapod crustaceans are treated with compassion and respect.
"We place as much emphasis on the importance of humane treatment and quality of life for all animals as we do on the expectations for quality and flavor," John Mackey, Whole Foods' co-founder and chief executive, said in a statement.
"The ways that lobsters are treated would warrant felony cruelty to animals charges if they were dogs or cats," said Bruce Friedrich, a spokesman for People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals [PETA].
In making its decision, Whole Foods pointed to a November report from the European Food Safety Authority Animal Health and Welfare panel that it said concluded all decapod crustaceans, including lobsters and crabs, appear to have some degree of awareness, feel pain and can learn. (Fox News)
PETA has always had a partially reasonable position towards animals, "that animals are not ours to eat, wear, experiment on, or use for entertainment," but the eating part is what is most confusing for many people, especially how PETA vehemently advances the idea through pure shock value.
The idea that animals should not be eaten because they feel pain (or to further along the logic, are nearer to humans in many important similarities unlike plants) is a mainstay argument for vegetarianism which is quite valid, as with Gandhi making a conscious ethical choice to not eat meat.
However, that's not going on with the majority of vegetarians today. One can deduce that from their belief in vegetarianism and then their "choice" to abort babies so "women can have sex with men they don't want to be pregnant by." (Ann Coulter) How selfish and uncaring towards others is that?
Most vegetarians have absolutely no clear argument on why they are vegetarian, even though a decision to be vegetarian can have merits if properly understood and applied. Modern vegetarians, in keeping with modern liberalism, base their beliefs on shock value and immediacy such that the pain, or the blood, or the crying out of slaughtered animals, is immediately emotionally shocking and thus abhorrent.
If a modern vegetarian were to watch animals being slaughtered while snacking on Paul Newman's organically grown red beet chips, then the emotional trauma might well associate over to the eating of beet chips (because they are red) and perhaps ultimately applied to all vegetables. The person would then protest the eating of any vegetables because they too, like animals, are living and the mineralist would have to subsist on a diet of powdered rock. This is where we are headed.
To single out inhumanity towards crabs and lobsters, essentially big insects and pretty far down the human similarity ladder, is how Whole Foods plays into the hands of feel good hypocrites. If Whole Foods wanted to take a proper look at the treatment of animals they would either eliminate all animal sourced food sales, or they would ensure better treatment of all animals harvested for their stores. Whole Foods has taken steps for better animal care but their overreaction towards decapod crustaceans is taking the humane argument too far. To be fair, they did try "lobster condos" which were evidently not enough.
This is a case of corporate management caving in to the demands of bean eating (and probably dope smoking) abortionists. Catering to these folk may be in the interest of Whole Foods since these hypocrites are a significant portion of their customers. However, the continued association of companies that have ethical policies with customers that are corrupt of mind stigmatizes the company and products as seeming problematic, and the high prices as elitist.
Overall, Whole Foods should be commended for being one of few companies among grocery stores to responsibly treat animals and provide healthy foods. This revival of caring for the land and animals in a responsible and sustainable way should be encouraged on its own merits, not only as a profit making enterprise as much of agricultural and animal farming is today.



