"The world is failing billions of people. Rich governments are not fighting some of the world's most deadly diseases because rich countries don't have them. And many developing countries are not doing nearly enough to help improve the health of their own people,"

said Microsoft baron Bill Gates before announcing recently his intent to work full time at his 28 billion dollar endowed Gates Foundation.

Rarely have the super rich ever wisely spent the money we lavish on them and Bill Gates is no exception. Let's look at some of the logic that Bill is bringing to the table at the Gates Foundation…

"The world is failing billions of people."

No, people are failing themselves. It is not the job of "the world" to repeatedly rescue people like mother to a crying child. People should stand up in a self sufficient manner with dignity and be the leaders of their own household, and any "help" from "rich governments" should be directed towards that goal.

Without fail, charities and governments need you to be dependent on them in order for them to justify their existences. The real mission of charity as one that "…suffereth long, and is kind; charity envieth not; charity vaulteth not itself, is not puffed up. (Bible, I Corinthians, ch. XIII, v. 4)" is long since gone as charities and governments scramble for recognition and trumpet your need for their dose of kindness.

Their "kindness" translates into making you dependent on them (and not on your own decision making) and downgrades further into fraud which Charitywatch.org warns us about. Well known charities that are repeated and imaged in newspapers and TV are not without infallibility. 

With a backdrop like this for charities, what is the Gates Foundation actually doing?

Their website states they are "Develop[ing] new methods and tools for reducing maternal illness and death, and…preventing unintended pregnancies."

Tools, we all like tools. "New methods" sounds good too and very innovative sounding.

Remember, however, that charities are usually engaged in fraud of one sort or another.

It took quite a bit of detective work but a deciphering team of decent and respectable parents concluded that "new methods and tools…[and] preventing unintended pregnancies" is a coded sentence for abortion. That means abortion on healthy uncomplicated pregnancies.

That doesn't seem very kind or charitable to others.

Regarding the worldwide scourge of Aids, the Gates Foundation is devoting massive amounts of money towards a "safe, effective, and affordable HIV vaccine…[and] education strategies aimed at reducing the…stigma associated with HIV/AIDS."

But is throwing truckloads of money at a cure for Aids practical? And shouldn't the majority of people—homosexuals, drug-users, and non-marital sex partners—who contract Aids, be stigmatized?

A better education strategy would be to have worldwide billboard ads reading: "Stop putting your private parts into everyone else's private parts! Learn how to respect your significant other on a higher level than self gratification! Stop shooting heroin in your veins! Have some dignity and presence of mind!"

This all falls on deaf ears, of course, because by blaming the virus itself and banging about our cymbals for a drug cure, once the cure is discovered we can live longer, wronger.

Abortion and anti-family values is the hope of Bill Gates of Microsoft and his Gates Foundation, a social engineering cabal that overlooked the quote, "Charity and treating begin at home." —Joseph Addison