Our religious correspondent Pastor Manning submits a cogent analysis of the media’s drubbing of out of wedlock impregnated Bristol Palin, daughter of vice-president contender Sarah Palin, to mainstream media alphabet soup’s Chris Matthews, John Roberts, Wolf Blitzer, and Keith Olbermann.

“The difference between Obama’s mama and Bristol Palin is that Obama’s mama was trash. I mean she was dirt. She was a bag of trash sitting on the sidewalk waiting there in Honolulu on one of those streets for the garbage truck to come by and pick her up and take her to the dump. Rather than the garbage truck coming by a man named…Barack Obama Sr.,…a pathetic alcoholic, [picked her up].” (Pastor Manning)

“That’s what my momma told me. If you don’t like it go tell my momma that you don’t like it.” —Pastor Manning

In Arkansas earlier in the week, a state repeatedly accused of being backward, fat, and ‘red-necky’, the most brilliant and intelligent piece of legislation was approved by the citizens.

It overshadowed all the many national ballot referendums at the time, even the ones that banned gay marriage and most certainly the medical marijuana and assisted suicide referendums.

It quite possibly overshadowed the presidential election, which aside from the cheerlessness over a broken Bush-clone war hero was nothing more than affirmative action in its most splendid form.

The good people of Arkansas, despite being the brunt of incest, hick, and dumb jokes, legislated to make it illegal for any individual cohabiting outside of a valid marriage to adopt or provide foster care to minors. (Arkansas Co-habiting Adoption Ban)

Why was it intelligent? Because it showed an understanding of proper family values: that a child should have the best start in life with a couple legally married.

Why was it brilliant? Because no mention needed to be made of sexual perversions, like gay marriage and domestic partnerships, that seek to steal the limelight away from decent men and women huddling together in marriage.

In Arkansas, marriage is only between a man and a woman.

The perverts were plopped back down into the gutter, without having to mention them.

Brilliant!

While medicated and metal-pierced face youths, old degenerate tie-dyers, and black faces were awed by Barack Hussein Obama’s “magic negro” mania and while McCain’s “broken man” syndrome sunk the nation, the 2008 U.S. presidential election bore striking similarities to the abnormalities of psychological trauma. On nauseous inspection, there can only be one rational explanation of the presidential election: Stockholm Syndrome.

Foremost among this traumatic conditioning of the vote was Obama’s black skin color that directly caused most of black America and many guilty white liberals to cast their vote for. As a representative sample, the District of Columbia, the nation’s capital and 60% black, voted 93% in favor of Obama. Marin County, California, which is 87% guilty white liberal, voted 78% in favor of Obama. These statistics might be meaningless and unconnectable, if it were not for the fact that Obama’s speeches and rhetoric mean absolutely nothing apart from the blackness of his face. And he isn’t even black: “Obama got a white momma” (Pastor Manning, youtube.com).

Now the associations, however unfair or quite possibly accurate, that come with black skin color: high crime, unwed mothers, welfare, and especially—the inability of black people to succeed on their own—have been so pounded and harassed into the citizen body that black people have come to accept this notion and white people enhance this notion through “affirmative action”. B.O. is a magnificent byproduct of all this, hypocritically sermonizing for “change” from this ingrained notion that his campaign rose to glory on.

Poor family values associated with blacks have been epitomized by Barack Obama’s broken family history. It reads like a steamy international romance: The young Obama was conceived out of wedlock; his Kenyan father divorced his white mother at two years of age; his mother remarried to an Indonesian stepfather with whom she had another baby; then she divorced the stepfather. Raised largely by a single mother, a disgrace unto itself, and steeped in his mother’s bedroom antics, Obama found this family values pandemonium, “like a little mini-United Nations” and his mother, “the dominant figure in my formative years”.

But it is precisely those immoral behaviors that negate Obama’s mother as a genuine mother and portray her as a worthless free-loving fraud who, not surprisingly, attended a radical high school in Washington state that spit on family values. With this in mind, the multi-cultural buzz of his family becomes merely an annoyance.

Incidentally, Obama’s close family, if you can call it that, died horrible deaths prematurely which shall not be fully detailed here. It is interesting to note, however, that Obama’s mother died of ovarian cancer at age 52—this after making a complete mockery of family values her entire life. It is also of interest that Obama Sr. became an atheist, then an alcoholic, next lost both legs in an automobile collision, then died finally in another car wreck. What contribution Obama’s mother lent to hapless Obama Sr’s downfall into oblivion is unknown.

Thankfully, Obama chose not to repeat the family disasters of his past and is still married to one woman, Michelle, their only children born within wedlock. Nevertheless, Obama’s family disaster proving grounds have had no small impact on him as evidenced by his radical associations outside of his family. This next trauma to mention attracted, in turn, still other black extremists, islamofascists, red-diaper doper 1960’s babies (Michael Savage), and their sympathizers—a growing movement of human offal which helped clinch mightily the presidential election for B.O.

Without a doubt, Obama’s most astonishing association is his 20 year affliction, if you will, with his moral compass ‘Reverend’ Jeremiah Wright, a pastor who preached hate against ‘whitey’ and that the U.S. government brought A.I.D.S. against black men. There is also Obama’s association with unrepentant domestic terrorist William Ayers, Palestinian terrorists, Marxist professors, and other radicals, but it is all either identified with by his seething slave-blood base of black voters or overlooked by guilty white liberals who think it is just horseplay and cute.

John McCain’s single greatest trauma that has so permeated his campaign is a doozy and not to be made light of. His story is everything that Obama’s was not: An American hero whose family history was not a semen stained panorama gets shot down over North Vietnam and brutally tortured for almost 6 years…

After McCain’s plane was shot down, he fell into a lake in Hanoi, breaking a leg and both arms as he ejected from the plane. A crowd gathered and pulled him out of the water, kicking and hitting him as his right foot dangled next to his left knee at a 90 degree angle. Instead of being treated under the rules of the Geneva Convention, someone smashed a rifle butt into his shoulder and broke it. A bayonet was stuck into his ankle and his groin.

Taken to the Hanoi Hilton, as the prison for American POWs was called, he was stretched out on the cold floor — and over the next several days beaten again and again, his broken arms and leg included. They let him lay there for days in excruciating pain, lying in vomit and his own waste. Eventually he was moved to a hospital, never washed or cleaned, to lie with rats and swarming mosquitoes.

His interrogators came to the “hospital” and — repeatedly — savagely beat him day after day as he shrieked in agony. Then it was back to his prison cell, where one guard would hold him while others took turns beating him over and over again. His ribs were broken, his teeth cracked. Both arms were broken, for the second time, neither set properly when finally treated…. (spectator.org)

And there, sadly, is where John McCain’s campaign for President of the United States never got off the ground. He sounded appeasing, never decisive, during his campaign. He never got around to pursuing his moral conservative base’s agenda of family values, illegal alien deportation, smaller government, and no taxpayer bailouts of failed industries. In all due respect to Senator McCain, his handlers behind the mangled scenes tried to pump him up as a “maverick” and gave him a “my friends” warmer line to repeat, but his voice sounded weak and broken.

McCain was subconsciously attracted to the dark side, the immoral liberal side, like to that fat red-faced womanizing drunk of a slob Ted Kennedy and their co-sponsored amnesty plan for illegal aliens. Probing deeper, it was McCain’s Vietnamese captors who falsely gained his loyalties long ago, while Obama’s mama was playing musical beds, and whose specter still haunted the aging McCain and wrecked his campaign into a jumble of disloyalty.

For B.O., it was his liberal voter base that connected successfully with the theme of past and recurring traumas, unlike McAmnesty’s conservative base which never got on board. It was a black face and its beleaguered notions that was the issue at stake (”A black man is going to win this election no matter what!” a Black Panther said at a voting booth, nightstick in hand), shouted along by a whole legion of the destitute, the fatherless, the jealous, the underprivileged, and historically guilty whites who fought for a seat on Obama’s magical bus.

The future has already been divined from a Kenyan tribal woman throwing sticks and bones on the ground: “With loud backfires, huge clouds of diesel smoke and a solar panel strapped on top,” she said, “this Obama bus is going to drive off into the sunset.”

Let’s hope that bus, like a clown car, can fit 53% of the U.S. voting population and keep on driving off into oblivion away from the rest of us.

There are those in the world, of which there are many, that find solace in their elder years from whatever words and actions were in earshot and eyesight during their youth.

Nay, you are old enough to know better. Nay, lift off the burden of ignorance from the youth.

…Conjugal love is possible only between a man and a woman

The special character of conjugal love is, furthermore, marked by the fact that this love can only come into being, between men and women and not between persons of the same sex, as is the case with friendship, parental love, or filial love.

It would be quite wrong, however, to reduce this characteristic to the sexual sphere and to say that conjugal love is just friendship plus sexual relations, presupposing a difference of sex. It would be incredibly superficial to consider as a mere biological difference the distinction between man and woman, which really shows us two complementary types of the spiritual person of the human species.

Certainly, man and woman have ultimately but one task, “to be reborn in Christ,” and to glorify God by their sanctity. Yet man and woman represent two different types of mankind, both having their respective significance according to the divine plan, and their special value quite apart from their procreative function.

Let us take the example of the male and female saints and consider how they, each in his or her special way, realized the unum necessarium, and how at the same time they fulfilled ideally the meaning of their respective natures as men and women. Raising our glance to the Blessed Virgin, we see that she, who of all creatures is most like to Christ, could not possibly be imagined as anything but a woman, and that she, Queen of all Saints, is womanly in the highest and most sublime sense of the word.

No: the difference between man and woman is a metaphysical one. A long time ago the Pythagoreans divined this when they placed male and female among the Categories, although in this, of course, they were not right. The medieval theologians, too, were thinking of this when they raised the question as to whether or not the angels were divided into male and female.

At any rate, for the human species this difference represents two manifestations of the person, analogous - if this comparison be admissible - to the various religious orders, which although they are identical in their aim, represent different ways in the imitation of Christ. These two types, man and woman, have a unique capacity for complementing each other. Their meaning for one another is something quite unique. They are made one for the other in a special way, and they can, purely as spiritual persons, form a unity in which they reciprocally complement one another. Marital love - involving the gift of one’s own person, whose decisive character is that the partners form a couple, an I-thou communion, in which the whole personality of the beloved is grasped mysteriously as a unity in spite of all outer obstacles - can exist only between two types of the spiritual person, the male and the female, as only between them can this complementary character be found…. (Marriage: the mystery of faithful love)

—Dietrich von Hildebrand (1889-1977)

White People and Outdoor Performance Clothes:

As white people get older, they like to make clear boundaries between their professional and personal lives. They don’t mind talking about their personal life at work, but they hate talking about their work life when they are enjoying a weekend or vacation. But with blackberries and laptops, white people could be working anywhere, at any time. So how do you know when they are off the clock? It’s easy, check their clothes.

When white people aren’t working, they generally like to wear Outdoor Performance Clothes. The top suppliers of these garments and accessories include North Face, REI, Mountain Equipment Co-Op, Columbia Sportswear, and Patagonia.

When you see white people wearing these, it is important that you do not discuss business matters. Instead you should say things like “where did you get that fleece?” and “what’s that thing holding your keys to your shorts?” White people will be more than happy to talk to you about their sustainably produced possessions…. (stuffwhitepeoplelike.com)

Another sighting of a weight related billboard near Toadvine Road and the Salisbury 13 Bypass was captured digitally by Geraldine Renshaw while passing by in her Buick Regal. The Wicomico Convention and Visitor’s Bureau department initially denied their sponsorship of the roadside ad, but Freedom of Information Act requests by the OR Newswire have revealed the department to be the primary funder of the billboard.

The billboard is a marketing technique designed by Clear Channel to promote Salisbury, Maryland and the surrounding area as a destination for larger people. Local politicians Executive Rick Pollitt and Councilwoman Shanie Shields are prominently displayed in the advertisement as examples of the body types to be found in the region.

In highlighted red on yellow background lettering at the bottom of the billboard, there is reference to the provision of insulin free of charge at the visitor’s center in north Salisbury, which an unidentified worker at the Wicomico Visitor’s Bureau confirmed as a "very popular and successful program."

According to the road sign, Giant food store, Rapa Scrapple company, and the McDonald’s fast food chain are also sponsors.

“Without reasonableness and morality, no nation can endure.”

With this comment The Outraged One sums up the plight of the U.S. and the upcoming U.S. presidential elections.

Yes, The Outraged One is again running for the office of President of the United States. Yes, he is generally sane, even though he sometimes speaks in the third person. The Outraged One’s platform and principles can be found permanently and conveniently in the upper right corner through the link “Our Demands“. But what of the other candidates and their standbys?

John McCain. Now here’s a guy who partnered up with that red-faced womanizing slob of a drunkard Ted Kennedy to grant amnesty to the 10, 30, 60 million, or however many illegal aliens that are swarming over the U.S. And here’s a guy who approved a $700 billion non-specific taxpayer bailout to unregulated and fraudulent banking and mortgage industries. That’s unreasonable and criminal.

Barack Hussein Obama. Now here’s a guy who held company with hate filled ’spiritual advisor’ Jeremiah Wright for twenty years and with unrepentant terrorist bomber William Ayers, and who toasts to Palestinian terrorist spokesperson Rashid Khalidi. B.O.’s experience to be President of the United States? Giving handouts to black people (while ignoring Asians who fare so poorly after coming to the U.S.) and organizing voter drives to elect politicians who will continue the handouts. That’s insanity, expecting a better result but never getting it.

Sarah Palin. Now here’s a folksy gal who brings some good old fashioned bible-thumping to the political mix. She also brings along a daughter of impropriety who spread her legs for a retarded lumberjack and, surprise - surprise, was impregnated without the benefit of marriage. That’s immoral.

To her credit, Sarah Palin is the only one among the well publicized candidates who brings some personal moral commitments to the forced two party presidential elections, which McAmnesty shamefully has not brought to their campaign’s foreground. With opposition to abortion, illegal aliens, and recklessly spending bloated government high up in the top ten concerns of McCain-Palin’s conservative base, their near complete silence on these matters is incredulous.

Joe Biden. Now here’s a guy who claims to be a Roman Catholic but is pro-abortion. How does that work? Who is giving this guy communion? Worse, most Catholics would not understand the contradiction there. When a man is a hypocrite concerning one of the most fundamental cornerstones of civilization, human life, no more need be said of him.

Ralph Nader. Now here’s a guy who is great on consumer rights and the environment but a complete whack job on everything else.

Finally, Chuck Baldwin—the only sane and moral candidate among the offensive lot except Outraged Richard. Find out more about the only worthwhile registered candidate running in this farce of an election: Baldwin08.com, if you care to. Is voting for principles a throwaway vote? No, it never is. Of course, unregistered candidate Outraged Richard would like to have your vote tallied (or rather, trash-canned) in his favor, but Chuck Baldwin is the second best consideration in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Elections.

There may be other candidates but the list grows tiresome.

So there we have it on the political level nationally: reason and morality dragged down by both the educated liberal elite and the country peasants of old fundamentalist values. Thank God for Outraged Richard and Chuck Baldwin!

Don’t forget, peasants, about local level action once the fantastic hype and underwhelming expectations of the national elections fizzle out:

• You can go to a quiet reverent church.
• You can press your local police department to arrest illegal aliens.
• You can teach your daughter to say, “No, thank you!” to the neighborhood boys’ tinkle bits.
• You can rid your community of organizations that rip healthy babies from mother’s wombs.

That last part at least the Palin clan is in touch with, but the following of some good values while ignoring others is why moral conservatives are losing credibility faster than the immoral liberals who never had any.

Vote for Outraged Richard, peasants! There will be much weeping and gnashing of the teeth initially, but that will give way to modesty, cleanliness, and joyful singing echoing o’er the land. It will be like the Mormon racket, but with financial transparency, no secret handshakes, and no polygamy. We shall call ourselves… the Eloi.

Thank you, peasants, from your Dear Leader.